Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/odaniels/public_html/saturna/wp-content/themes/unconditionally/functions.php:795) in /home/odaniels/public_html/saturna/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Planet Waves Parenting http://saturna.thinkhead.com/planet-waves-parenting/ musing and creative expression Sun, 20 May 2012 22:17:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: lorin http://saturna.thinkhead.com/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-312 lorin Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:47:19 +0000 http://saturna.thinkhead.com/archives/2005/02/28/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-312 thanks for taking the time, branka! i will pass on your words, and i also want to let you know that we turn no one away for the inability to pay. we give out comps in those cases, but we are also going to see about a scaled fee or something of that sort. much love, lady! thanks for taking the time, branka!

i will pass on your words, and i also want to let you know that we turn no one away for the inability to pay. we give out comps in those cases, but we are also going to see about a scaled fee or something of that sort.

much love, lady!

]]> By: branka http://saturna.thinkhead.com/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-307 branka Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:44:55 +0000 http://saturna.thinkhead.com/archives/2005/02/28/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-307 i just checked it out. i don't have to much time to comment (and browse through it), but couple of things that are going through my head IMO $50 is pretty steep. i don't do magazine subsriptions, but i don't think even national geographic is that much. and this is on line magazine. maybe it's because of astrology, which is not something i would pay a lot of money for. maybe it could be tiered - if you want astrology, pay more? maybe i just don't understand market for it. if it was $15/year i think it woudl be more likely to get 3 people/day to subscribe than 1/day for $50. you will also be creating a community of people who don't want to/can't afford $50. enough from me - i think it is a lovely site, and i would probably visit it more often - i like that it seems international, and very professional:-) i just checked it out. i don't have to much time to comment (and browse through it), but couple of things that are going through my head

IMO $50 is pretty steep. i don't do magazine subsriptions, but i don't think even national geographic is that much. and this is on line magazine.

maybe it's because of astrology, which is not something i would pay a lot of money for. maybe it could be tiered - if you want astrology, pay more? maybe i just don't understand market for it. if it was $15/year i think it woudl be more likely to get 3 people/day to subscribe than 1/day for $50. you will also be creating a community of people who don't want to/can't afford $50.

enough from me - i think it is a lovely site, and i would probably visit it more often - i like that it seems international, and very professional:-)

]]> By: lorin http://saturna.thinkhead.com/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-306 lorin Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:52:24 +0000 http://saturna.thinkhead.com/archives/2005/02/28/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-306 Hi Summer! I checked the page and it seems to be ok. Please try it again. There should be a letter on the front page and then links to the content on the right. Please let me know if it works for you. Thanks, Lorin Hi Summer!

I checked the page and it seems to be ok. Please try it again. There should be a letter on the front page and then links to the content on the right.

Please let me know if it works for you.

Thanks,
Lorin

]]> By: Summer http://saturna.thinkhead.com/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-304 Summer Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:29:30 +0000 http://saturna.thinkhead.com/archives/2005/02/28/planet-waves-parenting/#comment-304 I just went to the parenting site and it's no longer free, I got sent to a subscription page. I just went to the parenting site and it's no longer free, I got sent to a subscription page.

]]>